ATC 5163 AT Journey
For the next 16 days I will be introduced and explore the world of Assistive Technology and Literacy. This is my journey...
Thursday, 17 July 2014
Final Post
This has been by far one of my favourite classes that I have ever taken. It has been a great experience to wrap up my first masters with this course. I have learned a tremendous amount. Ever class was incredibly engaging and rewarding. As soon as we sat down the class took off and it was one amazing learning experience after another. To best describe this learning experience and the connections I was able to make to my teaching, I decided to create a comic web with the app Kidspiration (one of my favourites!). Enjoy and Thanking You!!
Article Response: Assistive Technology and Universal Design for Learning
Assistive Technology and Universal Design
for Learning: Two Sides of the Same Coin
David H rose, Ted S Hasselbring, Skip
Stahl, and Joy Zabala
A very interesting article about the
intermingling of Assistive Technology and Universal Design of Learning. It explains how AT and UDL are different but
they are completely complimentary “kind of like two sides of a coin”. It was very interesting how its said that
advancements in one prompts/drives advances in the other one. Low-tech AT has been around for several years
but High-tech is relatively new. UDL has
been established in other fields for years but it relatively new to the
education world.
“UDL and AT can be thought of as two
approaching existing on a continuum. At
the ends of this continuum, the two approaches are easily distinguishable. Toward the middle of the continuum, such easy
distinctions are muddied, and there are greater points of interaction and
commonality.”
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSAL DESIGN OF LEARNING
Assistive Technology is technology that
helps people increase, improve, or maintain the functional capabilities of
students with disabilities. It is designed to help people with their
disabilities overcome their struggles in various environments and promotes
independence. UDL is a process for creating
or implementing “products or structures” so that they are less challenges for
people to learn or achieve an outcome.
It promotes flexibility, alternatives, options and adaptations.
One of the things that came up for me was
how it would be easier to establish a learning environment that fosters UDL and
AT in a learning center compared to a classroom. In learning centers there’s lots of space
with various workstations and work areas that are set up to accommodate the
students. Often there are less students
in the LC compared to the classroom and more support. It has it’s own structure and technologies
that are designed around key students that utilize the room.
My favorite quote from the article is “As
assistive technology matures, it will advance by assuming increasing
connectivity with universal designs, taking advantage of the common structures
to provide highly individualized solutions that are not only sensory and motor
but also cognitive and linguistic-oriented.”
Thursday July 17, 2014
Great review today of the apps Clicker
Sentence, Clicker Connect and Cowriter.
It made a huge difference being able to experiment with the apps.
I am very thankful for the quick overview
of iMovie trailer because I had no exposure to it before. It was a great idea for the assignment but I
was highly stressed because of the time constraint. I needed more time to figure out the app and
feel comfortable with it. As well I wish
we had another group member because only two people in the group limited a lot
of creativity. iMovie is user friendly
when you get the hang of it and there were lots of choices. I wish we had more time but over all I enjoyed
the activity.
A lot of my students (and staff EPAs) would
love to use this app for an assignment.
I think my students that are strong performers would love this kind of
assignment. As well those students that
get nervous standing in front of large groups or class would benefit from this
activity because they’re not put on the spot.
With the app if the students make mistakes they’re able to go back and
edit they work. The app is very adaptable
and can be used for a variety of topics and evaluations. Again I think staff and students would really
enjoy the projects people put together.
Wednesday, 16 July 2014
Article Response-Technology in Action
Deborah Newton's article on Technology and Writing talked about the differences between lo, mid, and high tech solutions for students. At my school I feel that we have been doing a very good job with the low and mid-tech solutions (my school sounds so behind and ancient! It kills me when I learn what other schools are doing and how far we need to go).
Low-Tech solutions are aids or items that have no mechanical, electrical or computer components. At my school I was given a good box of grips from the Occupational Therapist from the IWK. With several of the students I supported we made a lesson out of trying the grips out and seeing which ones worked the best. I was worried that the students we become distracted by them but eventually the novelty wore off and the students that really needed them used them. Like I said in my other post about the fusion writers we use these a lot at my school. There must be an abundance of them in the Assistive Technology Library at the board because if you request these you are guaranteed to get them. From this class I see that we need to go forward and invest in more iPads. One for the things that I wondering about was the need of the external keyboard? Are we moving away from this sort of accessory?
The second half of the article examines high-tech solutions mainly computer-based programs. These are very helpful when you have a school (like mine) that are still using computers for assistive technology. Hopefully the priority will change at my school and they will see the financial and academic gain that the iPad will have.
Article Resonse-Diagnosis and Intervention Strategies...
Margaret J. Kay's article Diagnosis and Intervention Strategies for Disorders of Written Language was very interesting. The first part of the article went over complexities of the writing process and the second half went over interventions. One of the things that it talked about that I have been questioning is whether teachers should be teaching spelling. The article talks about this being a controversial issue because some feel it is important that students "invent spellings" and they believe that students will eventually "transfer" their knowledge. I feel that the researchers make a good point that students with LDs often struggle with making these connections and can't "transfer".
One of the things I thought about while reading this article was the idea about teaching technology skills with ELA lessons. Students at the elementary school I taught at did not get computer lab time until grade 2. If we are moving more towards technology and students using it wouldn't it make sense that students have their ELA lessons reinforced with technological devices?
Article Response-How Use of an iPad Facilitated Reading Improvement
In the article it talks about Josh's IEP and his required accommodations and modifications (all that can be achieved using the iPad). It also talks about a couple case studies where teachers did not implement modifications consistently. I find a lot of times teachers are trying to modify after the fact when they need to be modify before hand. This is another way the iPad is effective. Once you become comfortable with the device lessons or apps are easy to use and often times the student is able to use them independently.
One last thing that I respected about the article was the fact that it didn't sugar coat things. It was a realistic example of what helped and where the support needed to go for the student.
Article Response-The Education of Dyslexic Children...
Fast forward 25 years from when my sister's teacher recognized her struggling and we have my niece that has been diagnosed with dyslexia. Again she was quiet, pleasant and a teacher pleaser. Her teachers did notice some of her struggles but couldn't justify enough for testing because of the need at her school. She did not demonstrate the disruptive behaviour issues that goes along with male students with LDs. "Since boys are generally more active and impulsive, they are more likely to be identified through traditional school-identification procedures, whereas girls-who are generally quiet and who may struggle to read-often go unnoticed." My niece was very lucky because she had people in her life that worked very closely with her at home and finically they were able to get her the testing she requires. She sees a tutor regularly and is getting the help she needs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)